My current project involves an in depth look at
gender, sex, sexuality, and orientation. I am working on a hypothesis
of how these are actually divided up, what is fluid, how fluid the
different aspects are and the potential rates for each different
'classification.' As many who look into gender in any depth know,
it's complicated. So is a persons sex, sexuality and orientation. I
am going to go through my current basic breakdowns in the hopes of
getting some feedback on what others think of it. Parts of this will
likely make up the subject matter for my masters thesis as well as my
PhD dissertation.
So here are the basic breakdowns:
Sex – (C)ASAB, Sex Identity, Sex Attribution,
Body Map Fluidity
Gender – Gender Identity, Gender Expression,
Gender Attribution, Gender Identity Fluidity, Gender Expression
Fluidity
Orientation – Sexual Orientation, Romantic
Orientation, Orientation Attribution, Sexual Orientation Fluidity,
Romantic Orientation Fluidity
Sexuality – Libido, Exploration, Expression,
Identification, Identification Fluidity, Libido Fluidity
Each of the second categories have the various
classifications; e.g. ASAB → AFAB/AMAB. The ones I still need to
work on are in the Sexuality category as that is the area I have done
the least formal thought on for this kind of project. I really feel
that doing this kind of mapping can help someone realize that they
are complicated, fluid and that it is okay. While most people seem to
assume that their ASAB = Sex Identity = Gender Identity = Gender
Expression and that Sexual and Romantic Orientations are the same.
While part of the research I want to do on this includes asking
people these kinds of questions to find out if my hypothesis (that
people assume SO and RO are the same etc) is correct I also want to
use the fleshed out (and fully researched) version of this as a
potential prop for therapists working with gender or sexuality
“atypical” people to really look into themselves and to be able
to clearly share this kind of information with their family or
friends who they are having difficulties discussing these topics
with.
While therapy isn't my area of interest I want
my research to have practical applications for people and I hope that
this is the start of something that can really help people who are
struggling with identity issues. It can also help people who just
need to understand what someone is talking about. By putting together
a clear reference point a person can say oh on this categorization
scale my Sexual Orientation is Homo and my Romantic Orientation is
Hetero, both however are highly fluid. This tells a clinician
something specific and useful about doing relationship therapy with
the person. E.g. that the person is homosexual and heteroromantic
but that they aren't stable things and may change depending on the
other people involved or even just randomly. However if the romantic
orientation was stable then the clinician knows that the person may
be having problems in their homoromantic relationship because the
client isn't homoromantic and that isn't likely to change over time
either.
This gives me the idea of working on developing
a set of measures to help determine a persons categories. (I really
need a better word for it but right now, that's all I have. Ideas
would be useful.) For example doing a 'fill in the blank' where the
person puts down what they think of themselves as for each scale then
have a series of questions that can help determine the answers as
well. A clinical interview would also be useful to help make sure
that there is a complete picture of the client. This is straying out
of my field of expertise though so I will end the pondering there.
Long story short; I am working on teasing out
the complicated areas of sex and gender as well as how they interact
with others. I will be going into more detail on each of the
different categories over the next week or two and will continue to
do updates on this as the idea and the research gets more fleshed
out.
No comments:
Post a Comment